Multimedia ProjectExploring Influential People in the Hispanic WorldGroup Grade Presentation Rubric |
||||
|
Student Name #1: Student Name #2: |
||||
|
CATEGORY |
90-100% |
80-89% |
70-79% |
60-69% |
|
Content Grade___________ Comments: |
Covers topic in-depth with
details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thesis, both sub
questions addressed, conclusion answers essential question. Demonstrates
superior knowledge of research subject. |
Includes essential
knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Thesis and
sub questions addressed and essential question answered but could lack depth |
Includes essential
information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors, or sub
questions are not answered efficiently. Essential question is answered but
lacks depth or insight. |
Content is minimal OR there
are several factual errors. Thesis, sub questions and essential question not
addressed or answered. |
|
Attractiveness Grade___________ Comments: |
Makes excellent use of
font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. |
Makes good use of font,
color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. |
Makes use of font, color,
graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation
content. |
Use of font, color,
graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation
content. |
|
Mechanics Grade___________ Comments: |
No or very few misspellings
or grammatical errors. |
Three or fewer misspellings
and/or mechanical errors. |
Four misspellings and/or
grammatical errors. |
More than 4 errors in
spelling or grammar. |
|
Organization Grade___________ Comments: |
Content is well organized
using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. Slides follow 5
slide layout and are sequenced logically |
Content is logically
organized for the most part. Slides follow 5 slide layout
but may not address sub questions in organized fashion. |
Uses headings or bulleted
lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. |
There was no clear or
logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. |
|
Oral Presentation Grade___________ Comments: |
Interesting, well-rehearsed
with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. |
Relatively interesting,
rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience
attention. |
Delivery not smooth, but
able to hold audience attention most of the time. |
Delivery not smooth and
audience attention lost. |
Total
Grade:_________________________