Multimedia Project

Exploring Influential People in the Hispanic World

Group Grade Presentation Rubric

Student Name #1:

Student Name #2:

CATEGORY

90-100%

80-89%

70-79%

60-69%

Content

 

Grade___________

 

Comments:

Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. Thesis, both sub questions addressed, conclusion answers essential question. Demonstrates superior knowledge of research subject.

Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. Thesis and sub questions addressed and essential question answered but could lack depth

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors, or sub questions are not answered efficiently. Essential question is answered but lacks depth or insight.

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. Thesis, sub questions and essential question not addressed or answered.

Attractiveness

 

Grade___________

 

Comments:

Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.

Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.

Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.

Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentation content.

Mechanics

 

Grade___________

 

Comments:

 

 

No or very few misspellings or grammatical errors.

Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors.

Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors.

More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.

Organization

 

Grade___________

 

Comments:

Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. Slides follow 5 slide layout and are sequenced logically

Content is logically organized for the most part. Slides follow 5 slide layout but may not address sub questions in organized fashion.

Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed.

There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.

Oral Presentation

 

Grade___________

 

Comments:

Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention.

Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that usually holds audience attention.

Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience attention most of the time.

Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost.

Total Grade:_________________________