Rubric for Peer Review of PowerPoint Presentation

Content (50 points)	Thesis is interesting & provable	Thesis is provable	Thesis is too broad or too specific	Incomplete or absent thesis	Points
	3 or more main points	Points cover similar ground	2 points Points repeat	1 point
	2 examples per point	Unclear examples	1 example	No examples cited
	1 primary source per point	1 primary source per point	Source not primary	No source cited
	2 pieces of analysis for each example	1 piece of analysis per example	Analysis restates example	No analysis
	Conclusion makes connection beyond thesis	Conclusion summarizes & restates thesis	conclusion adds nothing	Incomplete or absent conclusion
	Bibliography with 6 sources	Bibliography with 4-5 sources	3 sources	0-2 sources
Design (20 points)	Title page has catchy title + graphic	Catchy title, no graphic	Generic title	No title page
	Graphics contribute to meaning	Generic graphics	Graphics not related to topic	No graphics
Presentation (30 points)	Presenter speaks to class	Presenter reads slides	Presenter mumbles	Presenter does not speak
	Presenter comfortably answers questions	Presenter attempts to answer questions professionally	Presenter jokes, uses unprofessional language	Presenter ignores questions